“Their lives must stay theirs—free from the weaponization of their (racial, political) identity.” This boundary-setting informs daily routines: home visits are rare, social media engagement is minimal, and educational choices reflect a deliberate push toward normalcy away from celebrity culture.

Despite protective efforts, visibility looms large. Both Malakai and Avery appear occasionally at public events—Malakai at conservative policy forums, Avery at youth activist meetups—where their presence sparks discussion not only about their views but about how celebrity parenting shapes next-gen political engagement.

Owens refuses to downplay their public identities: “They’re learning to speak truth to power from an early age—not to seek fame, but to understand influence.”

Race, Identity, and the Challenge of Representation

Educators and child psychologists note this approach diverges from mainstream parenting norms. “Owens models a kind of bicultural authenticity rarely modeled in public life,” observed Dr. Jessie Chen, a sociologist specializing in race and family dynamics.

“Her children navigate identity not as a performance, but as a lived reality—something that fosters resilience but also demands strong emotional boundaries.”

Political Awakening in a Polarized Age

That’s how I’ll build bridges, not walls.”

Parents and observers highlight Malakai’s authenticity:育て上げ by fierce advocates rather than polished influencers. Avery, though younger and still defining her voice, echoes similar sentiments in private family discussions—connecting activism to service, and expression to action. Owens has stated, “They’re not players in the culture wars—they’re listening first, acting afterward.” This measured approach contrasts sharply with the performative aspects often associated with high-profile activism, offering a distinctive model for young engagement